d1ddab2e6f
The most significant impact of this change is that fields whose types are type parameters should now GSONify just fine. For example, consider the class below. abstract class Foo<A, B> { A a; B b; List<A> list; Map<A, List<B>> map; } class RealFoo extends Foo<String, Integer> {...} This is a reasonable checkpoint but some work still needs to be done for this. In particular, the level of visibility of methods in TypeToken and Type should be reconsidered; we're exposing more than we need to! |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
java/com/google/gson | ||
resources |