- When using `TypeToken` prefer the `Gson.fromJson` overloads with `TypeToken` parameter such as [`fromJson(Reader, TypeToken)`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/Gson.html#fromJson(java.io.Reader,com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken)).
The overloads with `Type` parameter do not provide any type-safety guarantees.
- When using `TypeToken` make sure you don't capture a type variable. For example avoid something like `new TypeToken<List<T>>()` (where `T` is a type variable). Due to Java type erasure the actual type of `T` is not available at runtime. Refactor your code to pass around `TypeToken` instances or use [`TypeToken.getParameterized(...)`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/reflect/TypeToken.html#getParameterized(java.lang.reflect.Type,java.lang.reflect.Type...)), for example `TypeToken.getParameterized(List.class, elementClass)`.
## `InaccessibleObjectException`: 'module ... does not "opens ..." to unnamed module'
**Symptom:** An exception with a message in the form 'module ... does not "opens ..." to unnamed module' is thrown
**Reason:** You use Gson by accident to access internal fields of third-party classes
**Solution:** Write custom Gson [`TypeAdapter`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/TypeAdapter.html) implementations for the affected classes or change the type of your data
**Explanation:**
When no built-in adapter for a type exists and no custom adapter has been registered, Gson falls back to using reflection to access the fields of a class (including `private` ones). Most likely you are seeing this error because you (by accident) rely on the reflection-based adapter for third-party classes. That should be avoided because you make yourself dependent on the implementation details of these classes which could change at any point. For the JDK it is also not possible anymore to access internal fields using reflection starting with JDK 17, see [JEP 403](https://openjdk.org/jeps/403).
If you want to prevent using reflection on third-party classes in the future you can write your own [`ReflectionAccessFilter`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/ReflectionAccessFilter.html) or use one of the predefined ones, such as `ReflectionAccessFilter.BLOCK_ALL_PLATFORM`.
## `InaccessibleObjectException`: 'module ... does not "opens ..." to module com.google.gson'
**Symptom:** An exception with a message in the form 'module ... does not "opens ..." to module com.google.gson' is thrown
**Reason:**
- If the reported package is your own package then you have not configured the module declaration of your project to allow Gson to use reflection on your classes.
- If the reported package is from a third party library or the JDK see [this troubleshooting point](#inaccessibleobjectexception-module--does-not-opens--to-unnamed-module).
**Solution:** Make sure the `module-info.java` file of your project allows Gson to use reflection on your classes, for example:
```java
module mymodule {
requires com.google.gson;
opens mypackage to com.google.gson;
}
```
## Android app not working in Release mode; random property names
**Symptom:** Your Android app is working fine in Debug mode but fails in Release mode and the JSON properties have seemingly random names such as `a`, `b`, ...
**Reason:** You probably have not configured ProGuard / R8 correctly
**Solution:** Make sure you have configured ProGuard / R8 correctly to preserve the names of your fields. See the [Android example](examples/android-proguard-example/README.md) for more information.
## Android app unable to parse JSON after app update
**Symptom:** You released a new version of your Android app and it fails to parse JSON data created by the previous version of your app
**Reason:** You probably have not configured ProGuard / R8 correctly; probably the fields names are being obfuscated and their naming changed between the versions of your app
**Solution:** Make sure you have configured ProGuard / R8 correctly to preserve the names of your fields. See the [Android example](examples/android-proguard-example/README.md) for more information.
If you want to preserve backward compatibility for you app you can use [`@SerializedName`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/annotations/SerializedName.html) on the fields to specify the obfuscated name as alternate, for example: `@SerializedName(value = "myprop", alternate = "a")`
Normally ProGuard and R8 produce a mapping file, this makes it easier to find out the obfuscated field names instead of having to find them out through trial and error or other means. See the [Android Studio user guide](https://developer.android.com/studio/build/shrink-code.html#retracing) for more information.
## Default field values not present after deserialization
**Symptom:** You have assign default values to fields but after deserialization the fields have their standard value (such as `null` or `0`)
**Reason:** Gson cannot invoke the constructor of your class and falls back to JDK `Unsafe` (or similar means)
**Solution:** Make sure that the class:
- is `static` (explicitly or implicitly when it is a top-level class)
- has a no-args constructor
Otherwise Gson will by default try to use JDK `Unsafe` or similar means to create an instance of your class without invoking the constructor and without running any initializers. You can also disable that behavior through [`GsonBuilder.disableJdkUnsafe()`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/GsonBuilder.html#disableJdkUnsafe()) to notice such issues early on.
## `null` values for anonymous and local classes
**Symptom:** Objects of a class are always serialized as JSON `null` / always deserialized as Java `null`
**Reason:** The class you are serializing or deserializing is an anonymous or a local class (or you have specified a custom `ExclusionStrategy`)
**Solution:** Convert the class to a `static` nested class. If the class is already `static` make sure you have not specified a Gson `ExclusionStrategy` which might exclude the class.
Notes:
- "double brace-initialization" also creates anonymous classes
- Local record classes (feature added in Java 16) are supported by Gson and are not affected by this
## Map keys having unexpected format in JSON
**Symptom:** JSON output for `Map` keys is unexpected / cannot be deserialized again
**Reason:** The `Map` key type is 'complex' and you have not configured the `GsonBuilder` properly
**Solution:** Use [`GsonBuilder.enableComplexMapKeySerialization()`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/GsonBuilder.html#enableComplexMapKeySerialization()). See also the [user guide](UserGuide.md#maps-examples) for more information.
## Parsing JSON fails with `MalformedJsonException`
**Symptom:** JSON parsing fails with `MalformedJsonException`
**Reason:** The JSON data is actually malformed
**Solution:** During debugging log the JSON data right before calling Gson methods or set a breakpoint to inspect the data and make sure it has the expected format. Sometimes APIs might return HTML error pages (instead of JSON data) when reaching rate limits or when other errors occur. Also read the location information of the `MalformedJsonException` exception message, it indicates where exactly in the document the malformed data was detected, including the [JSONPath](https://goessner.net/articles/JsonPath/).
## Integral JSON number is parsed as `double`
**Symptom:** JSON data contains an integral number such as `45` but Gson returns it as `double`
**Reason:** When parsing a JSON number as `Object`, Gson will by default create always return a `double`
**Solution:** Use [`GsonBuilder.setObjectToNumberStrategy`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/GsonBuilder.html#setObjectToNumberStrategy(com.google.gson.ToNumberStrategy)) to specify what type of number should be returned
## Malformed JSON not rejected
**Symptom:** Gson parses malformed JSON without throwing any exceptions
**Reason:** Due to legacy reasons Gson performs parsing by default in lenient mode
**Solution:** See [`Gson` class documentation](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/Gson.html) section "Lenient JSON handling"
Note: Even in non-lenient mode Gson deviates slightly from the JSON specification, see [`JsonReader.setLenient`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/stream/JsonReader.html#setLenient(boolean)) for more details.
## `IllegalStateException`: "Expected ... but was ..."
**Symptom:** An `IllegalStateException` with a message in the form "Expected ... but was ..." is thrown
**Reason:** The JSON data does not have the correct format
**Solution:** Make sure that your classes correctly model the JSON data. Also during debugging log the JSON data right before calling Gson methods or set a breakpoint to inspect the data and make sure it has the expected format. Read the location information of the exception message, it indicates where exactly in the document the error occurred, including the [JSONPath](https://goessner.net/articles/JsonPath/).
## `IllegalStateException`: "Expected ... but was NULL"
**Symptom:** An `IllegalStateException` with a message in the form "Expected ... but was NULL" is thrown
**Reason:** You have written a custom `TypeAdapter` which does not properly handle a JSON null value
**Solution:** Add code similar to the following at the beginning of the `read` method of your adapter:
```java
@Override
public MyClass read(JsonReader in) throws IOException {
if (in.peek() == JsonToken.NULL) {
in.nextNull();
return null;
}
...
}
```
Alternatively you can call [`nullSafe()`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/TypeAdapter.html#nullSafe()) on the adapter instance you created.
## Properties missing in JSON
**Symptom:** Properties are missing in the JSON output
**Reason:** Gson by default omits JSON null from the output (or: ProGuard / R8 is not configured correctly and removed unused fields)
**Solution:** Use [`GsonBuilder.serializeNulls()`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/GsonBuilder.html#serializeNulls())
Note: Gson does not support anonymous and local classes and will serialize them as JSON null, see the [related troubleshooting point](#null-values-for-anonymous-and-local-classes).
## JSON output changes for newer Android versions
**Symptom:** The JSON output differs when running on newer Android versions
**Reason:** You use Gson by accident to access internal fields of Android classes
**Solution:** Write custom Gson [`TypeAdapter`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/TypeAdapter.html) implementations for the affected classes or change the type of your data
**Explanation:**
When no built-in adapter for a type exists and no custom adapter has been registered, Gson falls back to using reflection to access the fields of a class (including `private` ones). Most likely you are experiencing this issue because you (by accident) rely on the reflection-based adapter for Android classes. That should be avoided because you make yourself dependent on the implementation details of these classes which could change at any point.
If you want to prevent using reflection on third-party classes in the future you can write your own [`ReflectionAccessFilter`](https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.google.code.gson/gson/latest/com.google.gson/com/google/gson/ReflectionAccessFilter.html) or use one of the predefined ones, such as `ReflectionAccessFilter.BLOCK_ALL_PLATFORM`.
## JSON output contains values of `static` fields
**Symptom:** The JSON output contains values of `static` fields
**Reason:** You used `GsonBuilder.excludeFieldsWithModifiers` to overwrite the default excluded modifiers
**Solution:** When calling `GsonBuilder.excludeFieldsWithModifiers` you overwrite the default excluded modifiers. Therefore, you have to explicitly exclude `static` fields if desired. This can be done by adding `| Modifier.STATIC` to the argument.